USPTO serial 78163050
DECISION SCIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 6, 2004
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DECISION SCIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger S. Burleigh
JAMES L BAUDINO MUNSCH, HARDT, KOPF & HARR PC3800 LINCOLN PLZ 500 N AKARD STDALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE; NAMELY, A SUITE OF SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS IN THE FIELD OF STATISTICAL MODELING, ANALYSIS, AND FORECASTING THAT CAN BE EMBEDDED IN ENTERPRISE APPLICATIONS THAT PROCESS AND STORE INFORMATION ABOUT SALES, MARKETING, AND CUSTOMER ACTIVITY TO EVALUATE CUSTOMER PURCHASES TO FORECAST PURCHASE BEHAVIOR AND MEASURE CUSTOMER VALUE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 22, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |