USPTO serial 78163127
RETRO 3D SERIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RETRO 3D SERIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | AUTOMOBILE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY TAIL LIGHTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |