USPTO serial 78163184
JUICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JUICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN R.MILLER
JOHN MILLER MILLER GODDARDDX 11539 SYDNEY DOWNTOWNLEVEL 3, 50 PARK STSYDNEY NSW, 2000Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, hats and t-shirts | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |