USPTO serial 78163360
WORKFORCEEXCHANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 2004
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WORKFORCEEXCHANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank M. Scutch, III
FRANK M SCUTCH III MILLER, JOHNSON, SNELL & CUMMISKEY, PL250 MONROE AVE N W STE 800POST OFFICE BOX 306GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-0306Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING EMPLOYMENT LISTING SERVICES ON A COMPUTER NETWORK FOR OTHERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |