Drawing for KYRA INFOTECH

USPTO serial 78163653

KYRA INFOTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3330352Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 6, 2007
Examiner
LOVELACE, JAMES B
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with KYRA INFOTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberly G. Russell

KIMBERLY G RUSSELL LAW OFFICES OF KIMBERLY G RUSSELL3849 26TH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Employment hiring, recruiting, placement, staffing, and career networking services; business analysis services pertaining to information technology solutionsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 1, 2003
042Development of new technology for others in the field of information technology; research and development of new products for others; analysis and design of information systems; computer programming for others; consulting services in the field of information technology solution design, selection, implementation, development, testing, and maintenance of computer hardware and software systems for othersSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Nov 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 3, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 4, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 20, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 20, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 22, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 30, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 23, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2004GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2004CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2002PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance