Drawing for ROUTT ADDRESSABLE ABSOLUTE MEMORY GATE

USPTO serial 78164108

ROUTT ADDRESSABLE ABSOLUTE MEMORY GATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROUTT ADDRESSABLE ABSOLUTE MEMORY GATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sarah B. Eitelbach

SARAH B EITELBACH SARAH B EITELBACH, PS2830 CASCADIA AVE SSEATTLE, WA 98144UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042COMPUTING SERVICES, NAMELY THE PROVISION OF A COMPUTATIONAL GATEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance