USPTO serial 78164357
MAXGROW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAXGROW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Law Office Marcella Ann Stapor
MARCELLA ANN STAPOR LAW OFFICE MARCELLA ANN STAPORPMB 4041040 FIRST AVENEW YORK, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | WATER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT SPECIFICALLY AQUARIUMS,AQUARIUM FILTERS, AQUARIUM HEATERS AND AQUARIUM LIGHTING FOR REARING AND MAINTAINING LARVAL AND ADULT FISHES IN AN ARTIFICIAL ENVIRONMENT;INCLUDING THE ABOVE EQUIPMENT AND APPARATUS MADE PRINCIPALLY OF PLASTIC | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |