USPTO serial 78164416
FRESHCAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRESHCAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Becker
Robert W. Becker Robert W. Becker & Associates707 State Highway 333, Suite BTijeras, NM 87059-7507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Filled beverage containers, namely cans, kegs or barrels, entirely or primarily made of metal, and optionally filled by carbon dioxide and/or nitrogen and/or other gases, or having carbonization, which contain non-alcoholic beverages, namely milk, flavored milks, dairy-based beverages, namely milkshakes, milk-containing beverages, whey, whey-containing drinks, dairy-based food-beverages, chocolate-flavored drinks, namely pre-mixed beverages, vegetable-based chocolate beverages, vegetable-based food beverages, chocolate dairy-based beverages, and/or containing concentrates, syrups, extracts, essences, and/or solids, namely, powders, press-powder granulates, crystals, amorphous solids, all for flavoring or for the preparation of beverages, optionally included with a liquid for such preparation; milk, flavored milks, dairy-based beverages, namely milkshakes, milk-containing beverages, whey, whey-containing drinks, dairy-based food-beverages, chocolate-flavored drinks, namely pre-mixed beverages, vegetable-based chocolate beverages, vegetable-based food beverages, and chocolate dairy-based beverages, and/or concentrates, syrups, extracts, essences, and/or solids, namely, powders, press-powders granulates, crystals, amorphous solids, all for flavoring or for the preparation of beverages, optionally included with a liquid for such preparation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BALL PACKAGING EUROPE GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Schmalbach-Lubeca AG
- Other trademarks owned by Schmalbach-Lubeca AG
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named FRESHCAN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |