CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for K-TECH

USPTO serial 78165419

K-TECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3555198Status 780Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 30, 2008
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with K-TECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRENDAN ZEE-CHENG

BRENDAN ZEE-CHENG HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP8001 FORSYTH BOULEVARD, SUITE 1500ST. LOUIS, MO 63105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Parts of plastic [for circulation pumps for liquid media and for hydraulic, pneumatic and electric machines,] namely, cable bushings, cable holders, cable routings, holders for electrical connectors, mechanical fasteners, protective covers for protection against dirt, damage and injury; all for use in machines including hydraulic, pneumatic, and electric pumps, conveyer belt or conveyer systems, power saws,[ plaiting machines,] power scythes, lawn mowers, and hedge shears, all excluding machines used in papermakingACTIVEFeb 22, 2006
009[Parts of plastic for hydraulic, pneumatic and electric machines, namely, sprockets, drive shafts, protective covers for protection against dirt, damage and injury, installation wheels, motor casings, cogwheels, transmission shafts, mechanical fasteners, adjusting wheels, crankcases for motors and engines, cable routings, springs, cable bushings, holders for electrical connectors, and cable holders, all for use in gas meters, all excluding machines used in papermaking]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 18, 1999
011[Parts of plastic for hydraulic, pneumatic and electric machines, namely, sprockets, drive shafts, protective covers for protection against dirt, damage and injury, installation wheels, motor casings, cogwheels, transmission shafts, mechanical fasteners, adjusting wheels, crankcases for motors and engines, cable routings, springs, cable bushings, holders for electrical connectors, and cable holders, all for use in water filtration systems and air conditioners, all excluding machines used in papermaking]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 1, 2006
012Parts of plastic for the structural parts of motor vehicles, namely, [adjusting wheels, bumper coverings and pieces,] cable bushings, cable holders, cable routings, [cogwheels, connectors for profile strips of vehicle interiors,] crankcases for motors and engines, [fan lids, handles,] holders for electric plug and socket connections, [holders for mudguards, housings for steering wheel locks, installation wheels,] mechanical fasteners, motor casings, probe holders, protective covers for protection against dirt, damage and injury, ratchet levers, [sprockets,] stopping levers, [transmission shafts, ventilator flaps, ventilator grates]ACTIVESep 7, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2024TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Oct 24, 2024CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 24, 2024CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
May 8, 2024PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 25, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2022ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jul 25, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2018NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2018RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Nov 19, 201889AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Nov 16, 2018E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2017REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2015NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 20158.PRREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED—
Feb 17, 2015EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2014PRA8POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8—
Dec 14, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 11, 2014ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 22, 2008REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 18, 2008CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Nov 12, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 7, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 6, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 5, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 5, 2008EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 30, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 21, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 21, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 14, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 10, 2007FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Jun 20, 2007ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jun 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 11, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 11, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 16, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 16, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 26, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 15, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 10, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance