Drawing for TMAIL

USPTO serial 78165505

TMAIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYS, PAULA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TMAIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn M. Wheble

KATHRYN M WHEBLE COOLEY GODWARD LLPONE MARITIME PLZ 20TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3580UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE ELECTRONIC HANDLING OF BUSINESS TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS, NAMELY COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMITTAL BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONS OF DOCUMENTS SUCH AS PURCHASE ORDERS, INVOICES, CATALOG UPDATES AND PAYMENT RECORDSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2004MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 25, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 22, 2004EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 12, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance