USPTO serial 78165694
PHOSMAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHOSMAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna M. Weinstein, Esq.
DONNA M WEINSTEIN ESQ FOLEY HOAG LLP155 SEAPORT BLVDBOSTON, MA 02210-2600UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | BIOTECHNOLOGY AND PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, DEVELOPING ASSAYS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF DISEASE AND DISEASE PROGRESSION AND FOR THE IDENTIFICATION AND MONITORING OF THE EFFECTS OF DRUG ADMINISTRATION VIA THE MONITORING OF PHOSPHORYLATION-RELATED BIOLOGICAL EVENTS; DEVELOPING METHODOLOGIES FOR BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH TO BE USED FOR THE MONITORING OF PHOSPHORYLATION-RELATED BIOLOGICAL EVENTS, NAMELY DEVELOPING MARKERS USED TO DETERMINE THE PRESENCE OF DISEASE STATES, DISEASE PROGRESSION, AND EFFECTIVENESS OF DISEASE TREATMENT; DETERMINING BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORYLATION-RELATED TARGETS FOR DRUGS; DETERMINING PHOSPHORYLATION-RELATED BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES OR PHOSPHORYLATION-RELATED BIOLOGICAL TARGETS WHICH ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO BEING AFFECTED BY DRUGS; DEVELOPING METHODOLOGIES IN THE FIELD OF PHOSPHORYLATION-RELATED BIOLOGICAL EVENTS AND OR INSTRUMENTS RELATING THERETO IN THE FOREGOING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MDS Proteomics Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MDS Proteomics Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PROTANA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PHOSMAP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |