Drawing for CENTRX A BDP KNOWLEDGE VENTURE

USPTO serial 78165930

CENTRX A BDP KNOWLEDGE VENTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CENTRX A BDP KNOWLEDGE VENTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn E. Rzonca

LYNN E RZONCA BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL LLP1735 MARKET ST 51ST FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Transportation logistics services, namely, information storage and retrieval in the field of global data warehouse analytics, and providing rate and accounting information, planning, scheduling, tracking and tracing shipments for users of transportation services; management assistance, namely, assisting in the management of transportation, warehousing and distribution information and logistics; and business consultation in the fields of transportation, logistics, and supply chain processesACTIVE—
039Transport brokerage, namely, freight routing and forwarding, custom house brokerage, analysis and tracking, freight classification and landed cost calculations services; surface and air freight transportation services; and transportation of goods by ship, rail, truck and airACTIVE—
042Compliance services, namely, reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with import and export laws and regulationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Nov 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2005MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Sep 30, 2005ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Sep 30, 2005IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES—
Sep 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 20, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 20, 2005PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
May 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 2, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 2, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 9, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 20, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance