USPTO serial 78166557
AUTOPORTRAITS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTOPORTRAITS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein
Martin R. Greenstein TechMark a Law Corporation4820 Harwood Road, 2nd FloorSan Jose, CA 95124-5273UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing an on-line web site for consumer and professionals featuring automobile and motor vehicle consumer information, namely selection, availability, pricing, quotations, comparisons, sales, warranties, repair and maintenance, parts, customization and services information; providing automotive and vehicular consumer and product information via a global computer network relating to vehicles for sale, specification and performance reviews of vehicles, valuation of vehicles, availability of vehicle parts and accessories, dealers, manufacturers, automotive services and service providers, as well as trade information about general industry news; providing advertising, marketing and promotion services to others, namely the dissemination of advertising for others, promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of online advertisements, providing a website wherein users can link to the websites of the merchants and providing print, radio and television advertising, incentive awards, and cross-promotion and referral programs; E-commerce services, namely providing on-line retail store services in the field of automobiles and motor vehicles; automobile and motor vehicle dealerships referral services provided locally, remotely and over the Internet and via computer and data communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; computer services, namely providing search engines for obtaining data on a computer network, namely, and providing temporary use of non-downloadable search engine software for use in searching databases featuring information, catalogues, photographs, specifications, pricing, reviews, dealers, retailers, wholesalers, distributors and service providers in the fields of automobiles and motor vehicles, and automobile and motor vehicle accessories; computer software design for others; computer consultation; maintenance of computer software; maintenance and updating of computer software and computer services, namely, creating, maintaining and hosting web sites for a global computer network for the purpose of advertising automobiles and other vehicles for sale or lease, providing automotive-related services and providing general information and specifications about automobiles and other vehicles, and parts, accessories and services for automobiles and other vehicles; providing electronic and computer based product research in the field of automobiles and motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |