USPTO serial 78167055
THE PROCUREMENT INTELLIGENCE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE PROCUREMENT INTELLIGENCE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Walnut Creek,, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel, Esq., Tanda L. Neundorf, Esq.
SALLY M ABEL, ESQ TANDA L NEUNDORF FENWICK & W LLPTWO PALO ALTO SQPALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CONTENT CONVERSION, CLASSIFICATION AND NORMALIZATION SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE FOR EXTRACTING, COLLECTING, TRANSLATING, ORGANIZING, NORMALIZATING, CORRELATING, CATEGORIZING, ANALYZING AND PRIORITIZING UNSTRUCTURED DATA AND CONTENT; SOFTWARE FOR AUTOMATING BUSINESS PROCESSES; PROCUREMENT ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; PROCUREMENT COMPLIANCE SOFTWARE; COMPUTER E-COMMERCE SOFTWARE TO ALLOW USERS TO PERFORM ELECTRONIC BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR APPLICATION AND DATABASE INTEGRATION; USER MANUALS AND INSTRUCTIONAL BOOKS IN ELECTRONIC FORM FOR USE WITH THE FOREGOING SOFTWARE; AND USER MANUALS AND INSTRUCTIONAL BOOKS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |