USPTO serial 78167097
AMERICAN CULINARY INSTITUTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMERICAN CULINARY INSTITUTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT B. BURLINGAME
DOYLE B JOHNSON REED SMITHTWO EMBARCADERO CTR STE 2000SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | CONDUCTING AWARD PROGRAM FOR FOOD-RELATED AND BEVERAGE-RELATED COMMERCIAL FOODSERVICES AND CONSUMER DURABLE GOODS; ENDORSEMENT AND SPONSORSHIP SERVICES, NAMELY, PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PROVIDING RECOGNITION, INFORMATION, AWARDS, INCENTIVES AND BUSINESS NETWORKING IN THE FIELDS OF FOOD AND BEVERAGE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS, HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS, COMMERCIAL FOODSERVICE-RELATED DURABLE PRODUCTS, CONSUMER FOOD AND BEVERAGE RELATED DURABLE PRODUCTS, FOODSERVICE PRODUCTS AND RESTAURANT SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |