USPTO serial 78167171
AXIOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AXIOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN C. MCELWAINE
JOHN C MCELWAINE NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP151 MEETING ST LIBERTY BLDG STE 600CHARLESTON, SC 29401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Fixed position automatic identification scanners for reading labels and other identification markings on goods and packaging of goods to facilitate inventory control, tracking, sorting, and/or distribution of such goods | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 3, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |