USPTO serial 78167209
DATADOORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DATADOORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard D. Fladung
Richard D. Fladung Strasburger & Price, LLP1401 McKinney St., Suite 2200Houston, TX 77010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software used for inventory, storage, and management of seismic and geophysical data | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2002 |
| 035 | data processing | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2002 |
| 042 | data warehousing; technical consultation in the field of geophysical exploration, namely, analyzing seismic and geophysical data for others for use in the oil and gas industries; oil field exploration; oil prospecting; and geophysical exploration for the oil and gas industries | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Seitel, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Seitel, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DATADOORS
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |