USPTO serial 78167340
VENDETTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VENDETTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rutherford, CA
Rutherford, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda Joy Kattwinkel
LINDA JOY KATTWINKEL OWEN WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, PC455 MARKET ST19TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | WINE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Coppola family Trust, comprising Francis Ford Coppola, a U.S. citizen, and Eleanor Coppola, a U.S. citizen
- Other trademarks owned by Coppola family Trust, comprising Francis Ford Coppola, a U.S. citizen, and Eleanor Coppola, a U.S. citizen
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named VENDETTA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |