Drawing for NORMALIZE

USPTO serial 78167398

NORMALIZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NORMALIZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angelo J. Bufalino

ANGELO J BUFALINO VEDDER PRICE KAUFMAN & KAMMHOLZ222 N LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management and business consulting services, all relating to collecting, acquiring and organizing data relating to products and product descriptions, associated barcodes, product sales data, retail data, and product standards data and validating standards, classifying and numbering product attributes; market research and market analysis; preparing business reports featuring marketing and business management information; product information services, namely, providing research on product standards and classification, supply chain management, validation and standardization of product attributes; computerized database management services; providing an online database of marketing data and data in connection with supply chain management; providing online database of product data and classification information, product descriptions and associated bar codes, product sales and retail data, product standards data, data reconciliation and exchange information; business research services relating to product classificationACTIVE—
042computer software consultation, maintenance of computer software programs, updating of computer software for others, and computer software design for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 13, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 8, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 8, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance