USPTO serial 78167544
NORDIC BLADING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NORDIC BLADING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mäntyharju, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Scott
JAMES L SCOTT WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD LLP111 LYON ST NW STE 900FIFTH THIRD CTRGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503-2487Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING AND SPORTSWEAR, NAMELY, SHIRTS, TOPS, SWEATERS, JACKETS, COATS, SHORTS, PANTS AND GLOVES; HEADWEAR; SPORTS HEADGEAR, NAMELY, CAPS, HATS, TOQUES AND SKI HELMETS; FOOTWEAR; GLOVES FOR USE WITH WALKING AND SKIING POLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | SPORTING ARTICLES, NAMELY, HOCKEY STICKS AND BANDY STICKS, INLINE SKATING POLES, SKIING POLES, TREKKING POLES, WALKING POLES, POLE GRIPS, POLE STRAPS, POLE PAWS AND POLE TIPS; AND PROTECTIVE COVERS FOR SUCH SPORTING ARTICLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PHYSICAL FITNESS INSTRUCTION AND CONSULTATION; TRAINING AND INSTRUCTION IN THE FIELD OF INLINE SKATING WITH POLES, SKIING WITH POLES, TREKKING WITH POLES AND WALKING WITH POLES; ORGANIZING, SPONSORING AND CONDUCTING SPORTS COMPETITIONS IN INLINE SKATING WITH POLES AND WALKING WITH POLES; DESIGNING TRAINING PROGRAMS FOR OTHERS; SETTING UP FACILITIES FOR TRAINING IN INLINE SKATING WITH POLES, SKIING WITH POLES, TREKKING WITH POLES AND WALKING WITH POLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 24, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |