USPTO serial 78168184
ARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia Clarke Weber
CYNTHIA CLARKE WEBER SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | INTERACTIVE BROADCASTING OF VISUAL IMAGES, SOUND AND OTHER INFORMATION BY MEANS OF WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY, TELECOMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS, CABLES AND SATELLITE VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK IN THE FIELD OF INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GAMES AND QUIZZES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PROVIDING INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF COMPUTER GAMES AND QUIZZES; PROVIDING INTERACTIVE EDUCATIONAL MATERIAL IN THE NATURE OF COMPUTER GAMES AND QUIZZES ONLINE FROM COMPUTER DATABASES OR WEB SITES ON THE INTERNET; PROVIDING ONLINE INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GAMES ONLINE BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; ELECTRONIC GAMES AND QUIZZES AND COMPETITION SERVICES PROVIDED BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK OR ONLINE FROM A COMPUTER NETWORK OR DATABASE; ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING EVENTS, NAMELY, GAMES AND QUIZZES FOR EDUCATION OR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES; ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING PARTICIPATION, EDUCATION AND ENTERTAINMENT EVENTS FOR ACCESSING VIA COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, DESIGN, MAINTENANCE AND CONSULTATION, ALL RELATING TO COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INTERACTIVE APPLICATIONS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER GAMES AND QUIZZES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 5, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 5, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |