USPTO serial 78168218
LUNAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUNAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Schwarz
MICHAEL SCHWARZ MEREDITH & KEYHANI PLLC315 PARK AVE S 19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital integrated electronic circuits; computer software comprising tools for the design of integrated circuits and for enabling the integration of circuits into embedded and ASIC electronic systems; engineering development tools comprising computer hardware and software namely compilers, assemblers, linkers, debuggers, profilers, emulators and simulators for the development of software applications for electronic circuits; digital electronic integrated circuits for executing algorithms in real time for integration into digital circuit designs; digital signal processing cores for executing software algorithms in real time; digital signal processing subsystems namely cores and peripherals and facilities for in-system debugging for use in embedded systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |