USPTO serial 78168343
NXL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NXL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Laurent Quebec, CA
St. Laurent Quebec, CA
Ville St. Laurent, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christie Baty Heinze
CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Paintballs; paintball equipment and accessories, namely paintballs and paintball markers; sporting equipment, namely, paintball hoppers, paintball loading equipment, and harnesses, paintball barrels; sporting equipment, namely, ski and snowboard protective face masks and padding; motorcycle and motocross protective face masks and padding; apparatus for use in paintball combat games, namely equipment belts, protective padding, gloves; protective face masks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Procaps Encapsulation Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Procaps Encapsulation Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PROCAPS L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named NXL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 17, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |