USPTO serial 78168522
EEV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 11, 2008
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with EEV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ESSEX, GB
Essex, GB
Essex, GB
Essex, GB
CHELMSFORD, GB
THOUSAND OAKS, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Zoetewey
106, WATERHOUSE LANECHELMSFORD, CM12QUUNITED KINGDOMGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electron vacuum tubes, namely,[ travelling wave tubes, diodes, ] triodes, [tetrodes,] inductive output tubes, klystrons, magnetrons, [spark gaps] and thyratrons [; electrochemical gas sensors; infra red gas sensors; pellistor gas sensors; charge coupled devices; thermal imaging cameras; motion detection sensors; signal amplifiers for wireless broadcasting and communications; high voltage power supplies; signal modulators; microwave diodes; radar receiver protectors, namely, electronic circuits and electronic and microwave devices for protecting radar receivers; radar front ends, namely, low noise amplifiers, oscillators, mixers, up/down converters, integrated circuit modules, power amplifiers and transceivers; electronic safety and arming devices for weapon systems, namely, electronic cut-out circuits and electronic switching circuits and devices; voltage controlled oscillators; chemical sensors, electrochemical sensors and biosensors, all for use in the analysis of bodily fluids, drugs or other substances containing a biological component, using electrochemical, spectroscopic and optical techniques, in the nature of sensors and analyzers and computer chips and semi-conductor chips being part of or for use with such sensors and analyzers, electronic light sensors and electronic chemical sensors] | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | [surgical, medical and dental apparatus and instruments, namely, biosensors, namely, apparatus and instruments for the analysis for bodily fluids, drugs or other substances containing a biological component, using electrochemical, spectroscopic and optical techniques, in the nature of sensors and analyzers and computer chips and semi-conductor chips being part of or for use with such sensors and analyzers, charge coupled devices and driver boards for x-ray and video imaging systems, signal detectors and amplifiers for magnetic resonance imaging systems, spark gaps for lithotripters and] thyratrons for medical excimer lasers; radio frequency systems for radiotherapy machines, namely, magnetrons, klystrons, thyratrons [, power supplies, circulators and modulators] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by E2V TECHNOLOGIES (UK) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by E2V Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks owned by E2V Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks owned by E2V Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks owned by TELEDYNE E2V (UK) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by TELEDYNE UK LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named EEV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 13, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 13, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 11, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 8, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |