USPTO serial 78168574
FIZZOFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIZZOFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard R Alaniz
MONICA EVE JONES GINACOR513 31ST AVESEATTLE, WA 98122UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Herbal products, namely, products derived from natural ingredients; Dietary supplements; Nutritional supplements; Herbal supplements; Natural herbal weight loss and energy products, namely herbal dietary supplements in pill and capsule form; Natural diabetes treatment products, namely herbal dietary supplements in pill and capsule form. | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |