USPTO serial 78169022
RELOADABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RELOADABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Thousand Oaks, CA
Thousand Oaks, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services; namely, providing credit cards, debit cards,charge cards, stored value cards, smart cards, stored value travelers cards, ATM cards, payroll cards, cash disbursements via electronic means, and transaction authorization and settlement services | ABANDONED | May 5, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |