Drawing for INTERCEPT ARCHIVAL

USPTO serial 78169252

INTERCEPT ARCHIVAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERCEPT ARCHIVAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Morris E. Cohen

MORRIS E COHEN LAW OFFICE OF MORRIS E COHEN ESQ1122 CONEY ISLAND AVESTE 217BROOKLYN, NY 11230-2345

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Storage containers made of paper and cardboard; storage containers made of paper and cardboard which is chemically treated to protect the contents of the containers from degradation, discoloration, decomposition, aging and corrosion; paper and cardboard containers for storage of artwork, paperwork, jewelry, metals, currency or museum items for protection from degradation, discoloration, decomposition, aging and corrosion; paper and cardboard storage boxes; archival storage pages; file boxes for storage of business or personal records; three ring binders and associated slipcase covers; envelopes; folders; expandable envelopes; string tie and hook and loop closed envelopes; paper and plastic bags for packaging; paper and plastic bags for merchandise packing in envelopes or pouches; fabric and paper gift bags; general purpose plastic bags; merchandise bags; plastic or paper bags for household useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 19, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 16, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 26, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 3, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 3, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 2003CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance