USPTO serial 78169469
BABYCHIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2007
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BABYCHIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Reichenthal
Mark I. Reichenthal Branfman Law Group, P.C.708 Civic Center DriveOceanside, CA 92054UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | [ Paper goods and printed matter, namely, gift cards, occasion cards ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 6, 2007 |
| 024 | Gift baskets made of plastics containing baby and children's products and accessories namely, clothing, namely, T-shirts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 6, 2007 |
| 025 | Clothing, for babies and children, namely, shirts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 6, 2007 |
| 045 | [ Preparation of customized gift baskets with selected items regarding a baby or children's theme ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 6, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Drumm, Rochelle
- Other trademarks owned by Drumm, Rochelle
- Other trademarks owned by Drumm, Rochelle
- Other trademarks owned by HAFER, BRUCE
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named BABYCHIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 25, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |