USPTO serial 78169730
ART OF BLUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ART OF BLUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane B. Melnick
JASON M VOGEL KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP31 W 52ND ST 14TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | soaps, perfumes, toiletries, namely, body lotion, moisturizer, shaving gel, toothpaste; essential oils for personal use; and other hair and body products, namely, shampoo, conditioner, and skin creams | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | purses, all-purpose sport bags, beach bags, book bags, clutch bags, shoulder bags, traveling bags, backpacks, and tote bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, men's, women's and children's jeans, shorts, pants, overalls, sweat shirts, jackets, shirts, t-shirts, skirts and blouses; headwear, socks, leggings, scarves, neckties, hosiery; belts; scarves; hats; caps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Art of Blue, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Art of Blue, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ART OF BLUE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |