Drawing for IN THE PINK

USPTO serial 78170148

IN THE PINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IN THE PINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven R. Gustavson

STEVEN R GUSTAVSON BAKER BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-4498UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring clothing, namely blouses, shorts and pants, swimsuits, dresses, shirts, tops and sweatersACTIVEDec 7, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 28, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 28, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 30, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 7, 2005GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 18, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 24, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 19, 2005ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 11, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 14, 2004GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 28, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance