USPTO serial 78170279
SPOTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPOTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL SENSING MICRO SYSTEMS FOR SCIENTIFIC OR RESEARCH USE COMPRISED O MICRO FLUIDS AND MICRO ARRAYS, SLIDES WITH IMMOBILIZED CHEMICAL REACTIVE REAGENTS, MICROSTRUCTURED COMPONENTS, MICRO CHANNEL DEVICES, HYBRID COMPONENTS FOR TESTING AND MANIPULATING CELLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | CHEMICAL SENSING MICRO SYSTEMS FOR CLINICAL OR MEDICAL LABORATORY USE COMPRISED OF MICRO FLUIDS AND MICRO ARRAYS, SLIDES WITH IMMOBILIZED CHEMICAL REACTIVE REAGENTS, MICROSTRUCTURED COMPONENTS, MICRO CHANNEL DEVICES, HYBRID COMPONENTS FOR TESTING AND MANIPULATING CELLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | KITS FOR PRINTING MICROARRAYS FOR SCIENTIFIC OR RESEARCH USE CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF SLIDES WITH IMMOBILIZED CHEMICAL REACTIVE REAGENTS, MICROSTRUCTURED COMPONENTS, MICRO CHANNEL DEVICES, HYBRID COMPONENTS FOR TESTING AND MANIPULATING CELLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | KITS FOR PRINTING MICROARRAYS FOR CLINICAL OR MEDICAL LABORATORY USE CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF SLIDES WITH IMMOBILIZED CHEMICAL REACTIVE REAGENTS, MICROSTRUCTURED COMPONENTS, MICRO CHANNEL DEVICES, HYBRID COMPONENTS FOR TESTING AND MANIPULATING CELLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCANDINAVIAN MICRO BIODEVICES A/S
- Other trademarks owned by SCANDINAVIAN MICRO BIODEVICES APS
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named SPOTON
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |