USPTO serial 78170538
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam L. Brookman
ADAM L BROOKMAN GODFREY & KAHN, SC780 N WATER STMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Preparing audio-visual presentations and marketing materials for use in websites and business reports, all for advertising and commercial purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | ELECTRONIC STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL OF BUSINESS RECORDS, ADVERTISING AND REPORTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | DUPLICATION OF DATA, GRAPHICS AND DIGITAL INFORMATION ONTO CDS, DVDS AND OTHER MEDIA; PRINTING LABELS, CDS, DVDS AND PACKAGING MATERIALS FOR VARIOUS MEDIA; DIGITAL CONVERSION AND ENCODING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PRE-PRESS SERVICES AND MASTERING OF CDS, DVDS AND OTHER MEDIA | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | GRAPHIC ARTS AND GRAPHIC ART DESIGN; COMPUTER GRAPHIC SERVICES; PREPARING GRAPHIC DESIGNS, TEMPLATES AND MENUS FOR USE ON CDS, DVDS AND OTHER MEDIA AND PACKAGING FOR SUCH MEDIA | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2004 | GNPE | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |