USPTO serial 78170575
COLCHESTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLCHESTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Leeds, West Yorkshire, GB
Leeds, West Yorkshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy B. Goldsmith, Esq.
AMY B GOLDSMITH GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, PC270 MADISON AVE 8TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | (Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(e)) Machine tools and power operated tools; namely, machine and machine tool simulators, metal working machines, metal and wood cutting machines, spark eroding machines, wire cutting machines, lathes, electric motors for machines; engines not for land vehicles, drilling machines, lifting and hoisting machines, load and material handling machines, cranes, hoists, excavators, elevators, filters for machines, namely, metal working machines, metal and wood cutting machines, spark eroding machines, wire cutting machines, electric motors for machines; drilling machines, lifting and hoisting machines, load and material handling machines, oil filters for motors and engines, gas filters for motors and engines, air filters for motors and engines, air filters for mechanical purposes, oil filters for mechanical purposes; presses, namely, industrial machines presses, drill presses, stamping presses, spark eroding machines, metal fuser and electric welding machines, bearings, namely ball bearings, bearings and bushings, machine parts, namely, roller bearings, bearings for transmission shafts, being parts of machines, rotating centres and spindles for machines, collets and chucks, ball screw cartridges, starters for motors and engines, gear boxes and clutches for motors and engines, industrial robotic handling and control apparatus, cranes; hoists, excavators; ball screws; structural and replacement parts for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |