USPTO serial 78170868
COLDBLAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLDBLAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Jose, CA
San Jose, CA
San Jose, CA
San Jose, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BIODEGRADABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM THAT CAN BE DELIVERED INTO EXACT LOCATIONS WITHIN A FIRE, COMPRISED OF A CANISTER THAT IS FILLED WITH A PRESSURIZED LIQUID EXTINGUISHING AGENT THAT WHEN RELEASED FROM THE CANISTER EXPANDS TO REMOVE REQUIRED COMBUSTION ELEMENTS AND ENERGY FROM THE FIRE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ruebusch, Gregory P.
- Other trademarks owned by Ruebusch, Gregory P.
- Other trademarks owned by Edwards, Paul Clark
- Other trademarks owned by Edwards, Paul Clark
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named COLDBLAST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 16, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |