USPTO serial 78171988
BRICK OVEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRICK OVEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY C. GOLLA
MELANIE J GILBERT SCHWAN'S IP LLC115 W COLLEGE DRMARSHALL, MN 56258UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | frozen pizza | ACTIVE | Mar 24, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |