USPTO serial 78172093
MXM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 14, 2008
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MXM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Parna A. Mehrbani
Parna A. Mehrbani Tonkon Torp LLP888 SW Fifth AvenueSuite 1600Portland, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ FASHION ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, SUNGLASSES ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | [ JEWELRY, NAMELY, NECKLACES, EARRINGS, BRACELETS, AND RINGS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | [ FASHION ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, HANDBAGS AND UMBRELLAS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Women's oversize clothing, sportswear and outerwear and plus-size fashions, namely, dresses, skirts, jeans, jackets, outerwear jackets, vests, shirts, bottoms, pants, shorts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, coats, raincoats, jogging suits, overalls, suits, ponchos, sweaters, duffel coats, parkas, culottes, jump suits, polo shirts, body suits, blazers, sleep wear, bras, panties, and scarves; fashion accessories, namely, hats, belts, and gloves; footwear, namely, shoes, runners, boots, sandals, and slippers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | [ RETAIL STORE SERVICES AND RETAIL STORE SERVICES WITHIN LARGER RETAIL STORES FEATURING WOMEN'S CLOTHING, SPORTSWEAR, OUTERWEAR AND PLUS-SIZE FASHIONS, FASHION ACCESSORIES, JEWELRY, HANDBAGS, FOOTWEAR, COSMETICS, BATH PRODUCTS, GIFTS, AND WATER ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reitmans (Canada) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Reitmans (Canada) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Reitmans (Canada) Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named MXM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 9, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |