USPTO serial 78172835
CRITERION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRITERION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marya Lenn Yee
MARYA LENN YEE DONOVAN & YEE LLP110 GREENE ST - STE 700NEW YORK, NY 10012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Gloves for medical, dental and veterinary use | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |