USPTO serial 78173032
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerald E. Nagae
JERALD E NAGAECHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS PL1420 FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online retail pharmacy services; maintaining personal prescription drug history and pharmacy benefit plan information and files online; and providing online health information, all exclusively to Premera Blue Cross members | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2004 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2004 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |