USPTO serial 78173085
COLORAMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3072699Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 28, 2006
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COLORAMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Omegna, Verbania, IT
Omegna, Verbania, IT
Omegna, Verbania, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
Mark I. Peroff Hiscock & Barclay, LLPSeven Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Electric cooking utensils, namely, toaster ovens, automatic bread-making machines, electric kettles, electric coffee machines, electric coffee percolators, coffee roasters, electric coffee filters, all for domestic use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Non-electric household and kitchen utensils, namely, strainers, spatulas, containers for household or kitchen use not of precious metal, non-electric coffee making machines, glass lids for kettles, non-electric kettles not of precious metal | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BIALETTI INDUSTRIE S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by BIALETTI INDUSTRIE S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by BIALETTI INDUSTRIE S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named COLORAMA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |