USPTO serial 78173190
IMD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HORRALL, PATRICIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Petaluma, CA
Petaluma, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID H. JAFFER
DARCY M PERTCHECK NIXON PEABODY LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR STE 2700SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-8300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications equipment and software, namely, electronic circuits and supporting operating software for installation in and connection to telecommunications networks, plug-in circuit cards to be installed in and connected to telecommunications networks, and software for use in operating, managing, administering, monitoring, installing, provisioning, and maintaining the telecommunications equipment | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |