USPTO serial 78173255
WHO I AM MAKES A DIFFERENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHO I AM MAKES A DIFFERENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELLEN W STIEFLER
ELLEN W STIEFLER ESQ STIEFLER LAW GROUP PC3525 DEL MAR HEIGHTS RD #111SAN DIEGO, CA 92130-2122UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | JEWELRY, PINS BEING JEWELRY AND KEYCHAINS, BOOKMARKS AND BUTTONS OF PRECIOUS METAL | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PENS, STATIONERY, MOUNTED AND UNMOUNTED PHOTOGRAPHS, PAPER ARTICLES, NAMELY BOOKS, PAMPHLETS, BROCHURES, CURRICULUM GUIDES, CERTIFICATES FOR CEREMONIES AND TRAINING PROGRAMS AND NEWSLETTERS AND PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL AND TEACHING MATERIALS IN THE FIELD OF PERSONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT, REVITALIZING THE HUMAN SPIRIT, AND UNITING YOUTH AND COMMUNITY TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | BANNERS, SIGNS AND FLAGS OF CELLUOLOID OR PLASTIC; FURNITURE, MIRRORS, PICTURE FRAMES | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | SMALL DOMESTIC UTENSILS AND CONTAINERS, NAMELY CUPS, MUGS, BEVERAGE GLASSWARE, PLATES MADE OF PLASTIC, GLASS, EARTHENWARE AND PORCELAIN | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY T-SHIRTS, BANDANAS, VISORS, SWEATBANDS, WRISTBANDS, HEADBANDS, SWEATSHIRTS, HATS, SHOES, SLIPPERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DIFFERENCE MAKERS INTERNATIONAL
- Other trademarks owned by DIFFERENCE MAKERS INTERNATIONAL
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named WHO I AM MAKES A DIFFERENCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |