Drawing for HOLSBERG

USPTO serial 78174023

HOLSBERG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOLSBERG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert V. Vickers

ROBERT V VICKERS FAY, SHARPE, FAGAN, MINNICH & MCKEE, LLC1100 SUPERIOR AVESEVENTH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Milk, cheese, and dairy products, excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurtACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 16, 2005ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 4, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 4, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 15, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 14, 2004REINREINSTATED—
May 14, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance