USPTO serial 78174352
RED PEARL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RED PEARL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fountain Valley, CA
Fountain Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William M. Borchard
WILLIAM M BORCHARD COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SOAPS, NAMELY, DECORATIVE HAND SOAPS; PERFUMERY, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE, COSMETICS, HAIR LOTIONS; BAR SOAP FOR PERSONAL HYGIENE, FOAMING MILK BATH, HAND AND BODY LOTION, LIQUID HAND SOAP, BATH SOAPS, BATH CUBES, SOAP PETALS FOR DECORATIVE USE, PERFUMED BATH OIL CAPSULES, NON-MEDICATED BATH FIZZES; SKIN SOAP; BODY CREAM; BODY SCRUB; BATH SALTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 004 | CANDLES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |