USPTO serial 78174950
BDP CUSTOMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BDP CUSTOMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LYNN E. RZONCA
LYNN E RZONCA BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL1735 MARKET ST 51ST FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Customer services in the field of logistics and transportation services, namely, providing rate and account information, global data warehouse analytics, booking, planning, scheduling, tracking and tracing services via a global information network. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2005 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2005 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |