Drawing for PROJECT KEEPER

USPTO serial 78175040

PROJECT KEEPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PROJECT KEEPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa Winger; Christopher B. Schneider

Adam S. Weiss Schiff Hardin LLPP.O. Box 06079Chicago, IL 60606-0079UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Desk accessories, namely file folders.ABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 13, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 13, 2008OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 29, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 7, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 27, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 26, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance