USPTO serial 78175058
DIEBOLD LINX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2903858Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 16, 2004
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIEBOLD LINX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia S. Kramer
Patricia S. Kramer Black, McCuskey, Souers & Arbaugh, LPA220 Market Avenue, South, Suite 1000Canton, OH 44702UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, access control software for restricted physical areas | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Oct 17, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2013 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |