USPTO serial 78175184
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan M. Kent
EVAN M KENT MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP11377 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1683UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | interactive multi-media computer programs for games; CD-ROMs, CDIs, DVDs, and pre-recorded video tapes featuring music, education, nature, sports, science, history, the arts, drama, environment, health, life skills, consumer skills, leisure interests, and movies; video games, computer games; video games on compact disk; musical audio recordings | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | retail and wholesale services featuring multi-media recordings, CD-ROMs, DVDs, video tapes, video games, computer games, video games on compact disk and audio recordings; retail and wholesale catalog services and on-line retail stores featuring multi-media records, CD-ROMs, CDIs, DVDs, video tapes, video games, computer games, video games on compact disks, and audio recordings | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | rental and lease of multi-media recordings; CD-ROMs, CDIs, DVDs, audio cassettes, video tapes, video games, computer games and video games on compact disk | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |