USPTO serial 78175298
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
North Olmsted, OH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tara A. Kastelic
TARA A KASTELIC CALFEE HALTER & GRISWOLD LLP800 SUPERIOR AVE E STE 1400CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2601UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Faucets, including lavatory faucets, kitchen faucets, faucet handles, faucet valves, bar sink faucets, roman tub faucets and faucet filters; shower and tub fixtures, including shower heads, hand held showers and slide bars therefor, body sprays, shower valves, tub/shower valves, tub/shower diverter valves, tub spouts, tub waste assemblies; sinks; plumbing accessories including swivel spray aerators, aerators, kitchen deck sprays; bidet fixtures; and toilet tank levers | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | non-metal robe hooks | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Bath accessories, namely towel bars, towel rings, toothbrush holders, toilet tissue holders, soap dishes, cup holders, soap dispensers, and liquid dispensers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2005 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2004 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |