Drawing for SWEETPEAT

USPTO serial 78175459

SWEETPEAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWEETPEAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Nataupsky

STEVEN J NATAUPSKY KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014PRECIOUS METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS, AND GOODS MADE OF PRECIOUS METALS OR COATED THEREWITH; JEWELRY; PINS BEING JEWELRY; WATCHES; TIE TACKS; KEY CHAINS MADE OF PRECIOUS METALS; COMMEMORATIVE STATUARY CUPS MADE OF PRECIOUS METALSSACTIVE—
025CLOTHING, HEAD WEAR ANT) FOOTWEARACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 28, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 7, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 28, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 28, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 23, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance