USPTO serial 78175459
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Newport Beach, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J. Nataupsky
STEVEN J NATAUPSKY KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | PRECIOUS METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS, AND GOODS MADE OF PRECIOUS METALS OR COATED THEREWITH; JEWELRY; PINS BEING JEWELRY; WATCHES; TIE TACKS; KEY CHAINS MADE OF PRECIOUS METALS; COMMEMORATIVE STATUARY CUPS MADE OF PRECIOUS METALSS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, HEAD WEAR ANT) FOOTWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |