Drawing for E.Z. READER

USPTO serial 78175517

E.Z. READER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E.Z. READER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas Langer

THOMAS LANGER COHEN, PONTANI, LIEBERMAN & PAVANE551 FIFTH AVE STE 1210NEW YORK, NY 10176UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scanning equipment to detect a code carried on publications to determine that a particular publication is being read.ACTIVE—
035Services for measuring readership interest in publications, namely, scanning a unique code on the publication with a recording device and processing the resulting dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 14, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 25, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance